≡ Menu

Predictive value of the user seal check (of normal N95/N99 mask)

Document title
Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit

Author(s)

DERRICK J. L. (1) ; CHAN Y. F. (1) ; GOMERSALL C. D. (1) ; LUI S. F. (2) ;

Author(s) Affiliation(s)
(1) Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, HONG-KONG
(2) Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, HONG-KONG
Résumé / Abstract

Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Before use, the manufacturer recommends performing a user seal check to ensure that the mask is fitted correctly. This study aimed to test the ability of the user seal check to detect poorly fitting masks. This study is a retrospective review of a mask-fitting programme carried out in the intensive care unit of the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong. In this programme, all staff were tested with two types of N95 mask and one type of N100 mask. The results of the documented user seal check were then compared with the formal fit-test results from a PortaCount. Using a PortaCount reading of 100 as the criterion for a correctly fitted mask, the user seal check wrongly indicated that the mask fitted on 18-31% of occasions, and wrongly indicated that it did not fit on 21-40% of occasions. These data indicate that the user seal check should not be used as a surrogate fit test. Its usefulness as a pre-use test must also be questioned.

Revue / Journal Title
The Journal of hospital infection ISSN 0195-6701

Source:

{ 3 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment

*